Jaké hodinky nosí VIP?

[warann]

Tady je k tomu pěknej přehled (https://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-prices-past-60-years-revealing-analysis/?letter=I )

To show you just that, we created the following chart illustrating how the affordability of the Rolex Submariner no-date, one of the key models of Rolex, has changed in the United States, between 1957 and 2012.

Let me explain what you just saw above. The results you see labeled above every column range from around 6.7 up to 14. This figure indicates the amount of Submariners which the ?average yearly income per capita? could purchase in any given year. Since we are talking about a time scale of over 50 years here, for easier understanding and actual comparability, we have transferred all US Dollar prices and wages into 2012 US Dollars. In other words, in 1957 when the average yearly income was $13,591 (Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis) and the price of the watch was $1,225 (originally it cost $150 which, when calculated into 2012 US Dollars, is $1,225).

Now, in 1957 if the average watch lover spent all his/her hard-earned yearly income on Rolex Submariners, he could have bought 11 of them. By contrast, in 2012 when the average per capita income in the United States was $42,693 and the same model cost $7,500, the average US yearly wage bought you only 5.65 no-date Submariners.

We admit that this might sound like an unreal proposition ? because it is, as no one in their right mind would spend all their income on Rolex Submariners! But, let?s put that aside for a minute and concentrate on the point that is to be made here: when considering the average US income, the Rolex Submariner has become three times less affordable since the 1970?s ? and that is tangible, factual proof for a high-end watch gradually becoming a luxury item. In 1970, the average American earner worked 3 weeks to earn the price of a Submariner, while in 2012 the price of one accounts for over two months? worth of his income. This goes to show that although a fine watch has never been particularly cheap, some very evident repositioning has happened over the course of the last few decades.

[bandicoot]

Zjednodušeně řečeno, dřív sis za plat koupil suby, teď holt za dva platy.

Asi mam husí kůži...

[AndyAaron]

No a to si vemte, ze to je jen do roku 2012. Dnes jsme o 7 let dal...

[Joe75]

Nove Suby maji za jednoznačně nejlepší cenu v Brně na Stefanikove u pana Kalhause :-)

Ps: a odpadá u nich i problém nás veteránů, kterým se zhoršuje zrak a poradně na ty ručičky už nevidíme..

[Kid_A]

Ty sou ale luxusni..kolik za ne chtej?

[Radek Cigi]

Ta luneta vypadá jak z Pelagosů

[OWG]

škoda že tam není alespoň datumovka  

[Joe75]

Kolik za ne presne chtej to nevím.

Zkusil jsem si je jednou na ruku, zjistil ze jsou mi velký, tak jsem se ani neptal

Upraveno 16. srpna 2019 uživatelem Joe75

[bandicoot]

Stone Cold Steve Austin překvapil. Je to bourák.

[warann]

Dneska se asi hodí toto:

[fsu2222]

Nespletl jsis forum? Tady to je chronomag ne bandi.com

Zrovna pan Bandi, když ho zmiňuješ, nosí zlaté day-daty

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[petr_cha]

Tak nejak. Suby byly kvalitni potapky, tool watche pro armadu, nic vic. A kdo na ne nemel, sel do seika Willard.

 

Jinak tedy oni ty Suby dnes jsou vice mene furt to same, akorat se holt rolexu zdaril marketing natolik, ze ceny jsou takove jako jsou....

 

 

Aniz bych se chtel nejak zastavat, tak to zas takove drama neni, todle jsou tusim 60ky? Rolex v te dobe nebyl tak extra velky luxus jako dneska, viz treba roadshow video kde starsi deda rika ze kdyz byl jako vojak deployed v 60. letech v nemecku tak ho stali mesicni vyplatu tusim.

At uz to byla jak bylo, tak zaliba revolucionaru ve zlatych hodinkach je casta... Spis nez suby bych resil ty zlate.. :-))

 

https://quillandpad.com/2019/02/27/wrist-watching-fidel-castro-and-his-gold-rolex-submariner/

 

Che a bicolory..

Upraveno 17. srpna 2019 uživatelem petr_cha

[Kid_A]

Vrahoun. Hnus

[OWG]

Sergio Ramos a Rka

[matous]

Nevíte co má na ruce Šebrle?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Robero79]

Nevíte co má na ruce Šebrle?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

myslim ze stale dela ambasadora Ball, resp. ceskymu AD , tak podle tahu asi tohle - Ball Engineer Master II Skindiver II

https://www.ballwatch.com/global/en/collections/engineer-master-ii---6/skindiver-ii---dm3108a-scj-bk---1799.html

Upraveno 18. srpna 2019 uživatelem Robero79

[ragu]

Nevíte co má na ruce Šebrle?

 

Tipnul bych Ball Engineer Master II Skindiver II

 

[matous]

Jo to budou ony

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dreak]

Kdyby jses ho chtěl osobně zeptat, určitě je bude propagovat na SEWU v žofíně. Mával tam s nima celou dobu

[artsvk]

Tady je k tomu pěknej přehled (https://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-prices-past-60-years-revealing-analysis/?letter=I )

To show you just that, we created the following chart illustrating how the affordability of the Rolex Submariner no-date, one of the key models of Rolex, has changed in the United States, between 1957 and 2012.

Let me explain what you just saw above. The results you see labeled above every column range from around 6.7 up to 14. This figure indicates the amount of Submariners which the ?average yearly income per capita? could purchase in any given year. Since we are talking about a time scale of over 50 years here, for easier understanding and actual comparability, we have transferred all US Dollar prices and wages into 2012 US Dollars. In other words, in 1957 when the average yearly income was $13,591 (Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis) and the price of the watch was $1,225 (originally it cost $150 which, when calculated into 2012 US Dollars, is $1,225).

Now, in 1957 if the average watch lover spent all his/her hard-earned yearly income on Rolex Submariners, he could have bought 11 of them. By contrast, in 2012 when the average per capita income in the United States was $42,693 and the same model cost $7,500, the average US yearly wage bought you only 5.65 no-date Submariners.

We admit that this might sound like an unreal proposition ? because it is, as no one in their right mind would spend all their income on Rolex Submariners! But, let?s put that aside for a minute and concentrate on the point that is to be made here: when considering the average US income, the Rolex Submariner has become three times less affordable since the 1970?s ? and that is tangible, factual proof for a high-end watch gradually becoming a luxury item. In 1970, the average American earner worked 3 weeks to earn the price of a Submariner, while in 2012 the price of one accounts for over two months? worth of his income. This goes to show that although a fine watch has never been particularly cheap, some very evident repositioning has happened over the course of the last few decades.

Pekne, a najhorsie je, ze ta kvalita v 57 bola MOZNO aj lepsia ( rolexy nemam a nevidel som porovnavanie 57 - 2019) ale dnesny svet je hnusny konzum